Risk Level Classification of Contingent Liability Clauses in Financial Statement Notes Using NLP Techniques

Authors

  • Dun Liang Business Analytics, Fordham University, New York, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69987/AIMLR.2026.70105

Keywords:

Contingent Liabilities, Natural Language Processing, Risk Classification, Financial Disclosure, Text Mining

Abstract

Contingent liabilities represent critical risk disclosures in financial statement notes that require systematic analysis for effective risk assessment. This research proposes a natural language processing approach for automatically classifying contingent liability clauses into risk levels. The study constructs a specialized corpus from SEC 10-K filings containing 2,847 contingent liability disclosures across litigation, guarantees, and tax disputes. Feature engineering extracts linguistic patterns including probability expressions, monetary indicators, and temporal markers. A performance comparison of Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest classifiers shows classification accuracies ranging from 81.3% to 87.6% for three-tier risk categorization. Expert validation with audit professionals confirms 84.2% agreement with automated classifications. The methodology provides auditors and analysts with efficient tools for identifying high-risk disclosure segments requiring detailed examination. Results indicate that linguistic features—particularly probability expressions (e.g., probable, reasonably possible) and quantified loss ranges—significantly improve classification precision. This research advances financial text analytics by addressing the specific challenges of unstructured contingent liability disclosures.

Author Biography

  • Dun Liang, Business Analytics, Fordham University, New York, USA

     

     

Downloads

Published

2026-01-17

How to Cite

Dun Liang. (2026). Risk Level Classification of Contingent Liability Clauses in Financial Statement Notes Using NLP Techniques. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Review , 7(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.69987/AIMLR.2026.70105

Share